Point 12. All decisions of the Public Service Commission to be taken by simple majority.
The Constitution provides that any decision of the Public Service Commission shall be taken by an absolute majority vote of its Members.
This general provision, however, is qualified by other provisions making it necessary that in matters of appointments, promotions, transfers and discipline such majority must include a certain minimum number of Greek and Turkish votes depending on whether the decision relates to a Greek or a Turk. In short, a power of veto is given to a section of the Greek or Turkish Members to negative majority decisions.
It is obvious that this procedure for taking decisions by the Public Service Commission creates a situation whereby the Greek and Turkish Members feel that their paramount purpose, as Members of the Commission, is to protect Greek and Turkish interests and not to serve the true interests of the Public Service. Thus, even in the mode of deciding an issue communal criteria are superimposed on the universally accepted criteria adopted by similar bodies elsewhere. This is of particular significance in view of the fact that the Public Service Commission, in addition to being the appointing authority, is also the disciplinary body for the Public Service.
Furthermore, the procedure laid down in the Constitution creates situations leading to deadlock resulting in a state of uncertainty amongst the public servants and often preventing the speedy appointment of officers to vital posts. If this situation is allowed to continue, it will result in undermining the efficiency of the Public Service. It may be argued that, in taking decisions, the Public Service Commission may act in a discriminatory manner. In such a case there is adequate remedy provided by Articles 6 and 146 of the Constitution. The former Article prohibits discrimination against any of the two communities or any person as a person or by virtue of being a member of a community, while the latter Article provides that any person may make a recourse to the Constitutional Court against any decision, act or emission contrary to any of the provisions of the Constitution, one of which is Article 6, if any legitimate interest, which he has either as a person or by virtue of being a member of a community, is adversely affected.
Thursday, March 3, 2011
All Time Popular Posts
-
SUGGESTED MEASURES FOR FACILITATING THE SMOOTH FUNCTIONING OF THE STATE AND FOR THE REMOVAL OF CERTAIN CAUSES OF INTER- COMMUNAL FRICTION...
-
TC: "We need to realise 'what is it' that really matters, we cant have it both ways! The 'TRNC' is not a normal place, ...
-
What do you call the act of changing a nation's ethnic map in less than a month as depicted in the maps attached? Is a simi...
-
Address to Cypriots by President of the Republic Tassos Papadopoulos, on April 7, 2004, regarding the referendum of 24th April 2004 (full t...
-
Sovereign? Really? On whose authority? "The Embassy does not believe that the loss of Cyprus-owned physical infrastructure, nor th...
-
Hardliners are those who support the bogus BBF (bi-zonal, bi-communal federation) basis that aims to formalize the division of an illegal ...
-
1960 was the year the Cyprus Republic was formed. How can it possibly relate to the plight of Kurds in Turkey? Turkish Cypriots (here...
-
Makarios did not leave a memoir or diaries, so this 1974 interview with Italian journalist Oriana Fallaci stands as one of the more reveal...
-
Internal and external forces are tearing at the nation’ seams By Shehab Al Makahleh - - Tuesday, February 16, 2016 Turkey, an erstwhi...
Last 7 Days Popular Posts
-
The silent majority of decent CYPRIOTS who genuinely care for the future of their country do take a stand and they say to their leaders that...
-
by Lambros George Kaoullas Introduction Whether by shelling Kurdish fighters in Syria or downing a Russian fighter jet, Turkey undeniab...
-
Forget the Cypriot and the Turkish constitutions. Both are in need of serious upgrade. Concentrate on the essence. Turks insist on politic...
-
Sovereign? Really? On whose authority? "The Embassy does not believe that the loss of Cyprus-owned physical infrastructure, nor th...
-
by Kyriacos Kyriakides September 20, 2015 at 4:00 am Turkey has claimed all along that it stays in Cyprus to "protect" the...
-
The Republic of "Turkey" has been demanding POLITICAL & CULTURAL EQUALITY for the 18% minority community of Cyprus for the la...
-
Cypriots need to ask themselves whether the civil disobedience of Kurds in 2011 bears similarities to tCypriots' self-segregation in the...
-
“This decision is clearly a decision of war on the Kurds. It is a decision to send the Kurds to the mountains [to become guerillas]. If the ...
-
"It is so sad not to see the prime minister [Erdoğan] – who spares no effort to yell at whatever meaningful democratic word he hears or...
-
April 23, 2021 On 27-29 April the long anticipated UN-sponsored informal ‘five-party’ summit is set to commence in Geneva. The aim, accordin...
Newspapers & Media To Watch
About Me
Followers
Turkey's Kurds & Cyprus' tCypriots
As either unitary state or federation solutions are discussed as replacements to Cyprus' 1960 and Turkey's 1923 unworkable constitutions, should we abide by "if a right is a right too many for Turkey's Kurdish community (circa 23% of population) then that right is a right too many for Cyprus' tCypriot community too (circa 15%), and vice versa." Is the adoption of this fair logic the catalyst to securing just solutions for both UN countries.
