Point 9. The numerical strength of the Security Forces and of the Defence Forces to be determined by a Law.
The Constitution provides that the Security Forces of the Republic shall consist of the Police and the Gendarmerie and shall have a contingent of 2,000 men which may be reduced or increased by agreement of the President and the Vice-President of the Republic.
This is an unworkable provision because, even if the President and the Vice-President agree to increase the numerical strength of the Security Forces, such agreement will be completely ineffectual unless the House of Representatives approves the resulting increase in budgetary expenditure. Under the Constitution the President and the Vice-President cannot, by agreeing to increase the Security Forces, create a charge on the Consolidated Fund.
The question of increasing or decreasing the numerical strength of the Security Forces should, in the first instance, be decided by the Council of Ministers in the normal way and legislation be introduced to the House for enactment.
The Constitution also provides that the Republic shall have an Army of 2,000 men.
This provision is impracticable as no implementation of the numerical strength of the Army can take place unless the House of Representatives approves the financial expenditure required. Furthermore, no provision exists for the increase or decrease, depending on ordinary requirements, of the numerical strength of the Army.
Constitutional provision should, therefore, be made that the Republic shall have such Defence Forces as may be regulated by Law.
Antifon cartoons
Thursday, March 3, 2011
All Time Popular Posts
-
SUGGESTED MEASURES FOR FACILITATING THE SMOOTH FUNCTIONING OF THE STATE AND FOR THE REMOVAL OF CERTAIN CAUSES OF INTER- COMMUNAL FRICTION...
-
TC: "We need to realise 'what is it' that really matters, we cant have it both ways! The 'TRNC' is not a normal place, ...
-
What do you call the act of changing a nation's ethnic map in less than a month as depicted in the maps attached? Is a simi...
-
Address to Cypriots by President of the Republic Tassos Papadopoulos, on April 7, 2004, regarding the referendum of 24th April 2004 (full t...
-
Sovereign? Really? On whose authority? "The Embassy does not believe that the loss of Cyprus-owned physical infrastructure, nor th...
-
Hardliners are those who support the bogus BBF (bi-zonal, bi-communal federation) basis that aims to formalize the division of an illegal ...
-
1960 was the year the Cyprus Republic was formed. How can it possibly relate to the plight of Kurds in Turkey? Turkish Cypriots (here...
-
Internal and external forces are tearing at the nation’ seams By Shehab Al Makahleh - - Tuesday, February 16, 2016 Turkey, an erstwhi...
-
Makarios did not leave a memoir or diaries, so this 1974 interview with Italian journalist Oriana Fallaci stands as one of the more reveal...
Last 7 Days Popular Posts
-
SUGGESTED MEASURES FOR FACILITATING THE SMOOTH FUNCTIONING OF THE STATE AND FOR THE REMOVAL OF CERTAIN CAUSES OF INTER- COMMUNAL FRICTION...
-
Address to Cypriots by President of the Republic Tassos Papadopoulos, on April 7, 2004, regarding the referendum of 24th April 2004 (full t...
-
TC: "We need to realise 'what is it' that really matters, we cant have it both ways! The 'TRNC' is not a normal place, ...
-
Antifon: The solution to a great many problems Turkish policies maintain, including Cypriots' "Turkey" problem, goes through ...
-
by Lambros George Kaoullas Introduction Whether by shelling Kurdish fighters in Syria or downing a Russian fighter jet, Turkey undeniab...
-
The UK has a Cyprus problem. "Turkey" has a Cyprus problem. The USA has a Cyprus problem. The UN has a Cyprus problem. Cyprus ha...
-
No room for Anatolian concepts on the island of Venus Various inaccuracies in this article in Ottawa Citizen but one piece of informat...
-
The more Turks envision an ethnically divided Cyprus, a historical absurdity, the more we should impress upon them that an ethnically div...
Newspapers & Media To Watch
About Me
Followers
Turkey's Kurds & Cyprus' tCypriots
As either unitary state or federation solutions are discussed as replacements to Cyprus' 1960 and Turkey's 1923 unworkable constitutions, should we abide by "if a right is a right too many for Turkey's Kurdish community (circa 23% of population) then that right is a right too many for Cyprus' tCypriot community too (circa 15%), and vice versa." Is the adoption of this fair logic the catalyst to securing just solutions for both UN countries.