Uzay Bulut, Sunday August 3, 2014 | What about Turkey and Cyprus? Part 2
For part 1, see "For What about Turkey and Cyprus?"
Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan said in his presidential election rally in the southern province of Mersin that Israel will be tried by an international court if it continues to act with its current mentality. "We will see that. As Turkey, we will struggle for that," he added.
Ironically, when the European Court of Human Rights convicted Turkey in May of this year for its crimes during the 1974 invasion of Cyprus, Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu said that Turkey would ignore the ECHR ruling to pay compensation to the Republic of Cyprus.
"This ruling is neither binding within international law nor does it have any value for us," Davutoglu said.
Davutoglu made these statements at the end of a meeting of the U.N. Committee on the Exercise of the Inalienable Rights of the Palestinian People.
So, after passionately defending the inalienable rights of the Palestinian people, Davutoglu announced that Turkey would refuse to pay Cyprus the compensation ruled by the ECHR in respect of the non-pecuniary damage suffered by the relatives of the missing persons, and by the enclaved Greek-Cypriot residents of the Karpas peninsula during the Turkish invasion of Cyprus.
If Turkish state officials do not recognize the rulings of international courts, then why do they threaten Israel with being tried in the same courts?
In 2011, Erdogan said that Hamas is not a terrorist organization but a movement of resistance that tries to protect its country from occupation. When Erdogan said that, the Gaza Strip was not occupied; there was not a single Israeli in Gaza as Israel had withdrawn all its citizens and soldiers from there in 2005.
Erdogan, who has a great deal of sympathy for Hamas, does not seem to have the least of it for the Republic of Cyprus.
Last year, he even said at a meeting at Eotvos Lorand University in Budapest that "there is not a country called Cyprus."
He added: "There is the Southern Greek Cypriot Administration. There is a Green Line, and then at the northern part of it is the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus. The new name of this region according to the Organization of Islamic Cooperation is the Turkish State of Cyprus. The Kofi Annan plan also names it like that."
Unfortunately, no one in the conference rectified Erdogan's incorrect statements.
Of course there is a country called the Republic of Cyprus. This is recognized by the whole world, although the northern part of it has been occupied by Turkey for 40 years. And there is also the "Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus," which is recognized only by Turkey. The international community correctly calls it the Turkish-occupied territory of the Republic of Cyprus.
But how did the occupied northern part of Cyprus fall into the hands of Turkey?
Even though Turkish state officials proudly acclaim their 1974 "victory" in Cyprus, and try to insult the Republic of Cyprus by claiming that it does not exist, the 1974 invasion of the island was a collective crime against humanity and never a victory for people of conscience.
The "victory" for Turkey was a deprivation of life for Cypriots, including indiscriminate killings of civilians, the bombing of civilian targets and hospitals, and cold-blooded murders that included women, old men, and children as young as 6 months old.
Turkish army officials who took part in the invasion not only killed Cypriot civilians but stole their property, as well.
Land, houses, businesses and industries belonging to Greek Cypriots were seized and distributed by the Turkish occupation forces to persons other than their legal owners.
They subjected persons of both sexes and all ages to torture and degrading treatment, including wholesale and repeated rapes.
They arbitrarily detained thousands of Greek Cypriot civilians in the occupied area under inhuman conditions. They subjected them to forced labor and established concentration camps.
A total of 1,619 persons have been missing since the 1974 Turkish invasion of Cyprus and as a direct consequence of it.
Turkey, which forcibly displaced approximately 170,000 Greek Cypriots from their homes in the occupied area and refused to allow them to return, is blaming Israel for being an "occupier" in an attempt to boost its own international prestige.
After committing all those crimes against humanity, Turkish state officials falsely declare that there is no country called Cyprus.
Ever since the occupation began, Turkey has maintained that it carried out a "peace operation" to restore the constitutional order of Cyprus following a brief Greek Cypriot coup and to protect Turkish Cypriots from harm and danger.
Turkey experienced two coups d'etat, in 1960 and 1971, before invading Cyprus.
Then, six years after the invasion of Cyprus, in 1980, came the most horrific Turkish coup d'etat, claiming thousands of lives. How can Turkey, which has not been able to draft a civil constitution for itself for 34 years after this coup, claim the ability to restore another country's constitutional order?
The human rights record of Turkey during and after the occupation shows clearly that the brief Greek coup d'etat was just a pretext for Turkey to invade Cyprus.
You don't torture, rape or forcibly displace innocent civilians after seizing their property if your only aim is to restore constitutional order and to protect people there.
Sadly, the international community buys into this Turkish state propaganda. And even globally known intellectuals such as Noam Chomsky seem to fall into its trap.
"Turkey is the only country that has explicitly displayed its stern attitude toward Israel and has opposed Israel's oppression of Palestine," Chomsky told the state-run Anadolu news agency. But while praising Turkey's attitude toward Israel, he uttered not a word about the Turkish occupation of Cyprus.
Every time the international community sees Turkish state officials bashing Israel for its military operation in Gaza, it should recall the ongoing Turkish occupation of Cyprus.
Wars must come to an end; killings of innocent people must come to an end. So must hypocrisy and double standards.
While the officials of a colonizing country are occupying the land of Cypriots, can they be sincerely concerned about the suffering in Gaza? If they can, it only shows their hypocrisy and anti-Semitism.
Uzay Bulut is a freelance journalist based in Ankara.
Link to source: http://www.israelhayom.com/site/newsletter_opinion.php?id=9431
Monday, August 4, 2014
What about Turkey and Cyprus? Part 2 | Uzay Bulut
Categories:
Anti-Semitism,
Double Standards,
ECHR,
Hypocrisy,
Palestine,
Press,
Uzay Bulut
All Time Popular Posts
-
SUGGESTED MEASURES FOR FACILITATING THE SMOOTH FUNCTIONING OF THE STATE AND FOR THE REMOVAL OF CERTAIN CAUSES OF INTER- COMMUNAL FRICTION...
-
TC: "We need to realise 'what is it' that really matters, we cant have it both ways! The 'TRNC' is not a normal place, ...
-
What do you call the act of changing a nation's ethnic map in less than a month as depicted in the maps attached? Is a simi...
-
Address to Cypriots by President of the Republic Tassos Papadopoulos, on April 7, 2004, regarding the referendum of 24th April 2004 (full t...
-
Sovereign? Really? On whose authority? "The Embassy does not believe that the loss of Cyprus-owned physical infrastructure, nor th...
-
Hardliners are those who support the bogus BBF (bi-zonal, bi-communal federation) basis that aims to formalize the division of an illegal ...
-
1960 was the year the Cyprus Republic was formed. How can it possibly relate to the plight of Kurds in Turkey? Turkish Cypriots (here...
-
Makarios did not leave a memoir or diaries, so this 1974 interview with Italian journalist Oriana Fallaci stands as one of the more reveal...
-
Internal and external forces are tearing at the nation’ seams By Shehab Al Makahleh - - Tuesday, February 16, 2016 Turkey, an erstwhi...
Last 7 Days Popular Posts
-
Makarios did not leave a memoir or diaries, so this 1974 interview with Italian journalist Oriana Fallaci stands as one of the more reveal...
-
"It appears to me that Turkish Cypriots are at a juncture. Convince the Turkish tax payer to sponsor a Cypriot life in relative luxury...
-
It is not so much the illegal occupation of Cyprus that should not be forgotten & condemned, but the ongoing illegal colonization &...
-
In 1963 a document was put up for discussion by the Cypriot President, not dissimilar to what Erdogan is doing today in Turkey, putting up ...
-
Desmond Tutu The Kurdish-language television station Roj TV has been nominated as a candidate for a Nobel Peace Prize by a group that in...
-
Published on Oct 6, 2015 - The British Prime Minister suggests that he will try and personally intervene with Saudi Arabian authorities in ...
-
Dear all, I regard it as a great honour to be here today to share the presentation of this excellently documented long awaited historic...
-
An exchange based on a Wikileaks revelation on the Cyprus Mail website pertaining to the article "A cosy lunch on the Bosporus is no...
-
In the 1950s gCypriots decided on an action without consulting tCypriots. They are in essence to blame for what ensued. They lacked strate...
-
“As far as the Commission and the other states are concerned, I think the real question is how long can we let this spoiled member of the E...
Newspapers & Media To Watch
About Me
Followers
Turkey's Kurds & Cyprus' tCypriots
As either unitary state or federation solutions are discussed as replacements to Cyprus' 1960 and Turkey's 1923 unworkable constitutions, should we abide by "if a right is a right too many for Turkey's Kurdish community (circa 23% of population) then that right is a right too many for Cyprus' tCypriot community too (circa 15%), and vice versa." Is the adoption of this fair logic the catalyst to securing just solutions for both UN countries.